Von offizieller Seite:
Q. Members report that applicants do not learn of the need to obtain good conduct certificates/police certificates because of unsuccessful fingerprint capture until multiple fingerprint appointments have been scheduled and completed and interviews are scheduled solely on the basis that the fingerprint information is unreadable. This situation causes unnecessary delay and a waste of resources for both USCIS and applicants. AILA requests USCIS consider implementing a uniform policy to request good conduct/police reports from the applicants earlier in the process once it is discovered that the fingerprint information is unreadable.
A. A determination that an applicant’s fingerprints are unclassifiable requires two fingerprint appointments. Often, fingerprints rejected after the first appointment return a valid result after the second appointment. This occurs in roughly half of cases involving an initial reject. Per the January 5, 2005 memorandum titled, “Revised Interview Waiver Criteria for Form I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status,” when an applicant’s fingerprints have been twice rejected as unclassifiable, the adjudicator must request that the applicant provide a five-year certification of good conduct from local law enforcement and take a sworn statement from the applicant. In cases where the applicant’s fingerprints have twice been rejected as unclassifiable, the Service Center will relocate the file to a field office with a memo to file stating that the case is being relocated because the applicant needs to provide police clearances and execute a sworn statement.
The May 1, 2006 Office of Field Operations I-485 Standard Operating Procedures, version 2.1, indicates that applicants with twice rejected fingerprints are ineligible for an interview waiver and therefore must appear in person to provide police clearances and a sworn statement. That SOP further indicates that “If the fingerprint response shows two current Rejects, prepare Record of Sworn Statement (Form I-263), and request police clearances for all residences within the U.S.” When the field office calls the applicant in for an interview, the field office notifies the applicant that he or she must bring the required police clearances to the interview. Given that half of all fingerprints rejected after the first appointment return a valid result after the second, coupled with the fact that for reasons of public safety and national security individuals with twice rejected fingerprints must appear in person to provide police clearances and a sworn statement, we disagree with the recommendation that police clearances should be required earlier in the background check process.
Quelle:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/ ... 2ca60aRCRD
Und von der Seite der Anwälte:
BURNED FINGERS -- If a person has burn scars on all fingers so that no fingerprints may be captured, this is another case in which fingerprinting is not physically possible, but is not considered a waiver. This should be noted in the visa case file. [...]
PERMANENT ABNORMAL FINGER -- If an abnormal condition, such as a growth on the finger, is permanent, the applicant would need to present a statement from a doctor attesting to the permanency of the condition. In such a case, if a good quality print cannot be obtained from the index finger, the thumb should be printed instead.
Quelle:
http://www.tindallfoster.com/immigratio ... IOVISA.pdf (S. 2f.)
Ich wünsch dir viel Glück, sieht machbar aus.
(hier von anderen Betroffenen:
http://www.immigrate2us.net/forum/showt ... ly-damaged
http://forums.immigration.com/showthrea ... unreadable)
